Talk:Marc Godbout
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editAn anonymous user with IP address 70.27.7.36 has been inserting a malicious and false references. There is an election campaign underway at this time.
Pretty pathetic
editokay, what is this guy doing? the current page is ridiculous and should either be edited or completely taken down. wikipedia is being abused as a poltical launchpad for complete and utter no-name Canadian MPs and candidates and their even less remarkable supporters. does wikipedia ever ban IPs?
i rely on wikipedia for decent information, and i'm beginning to think that recent candidate/MP information during an election is fringe knowlege that goes beyond something Wikipedia can handle and police. perhaps rules should be made so that pages of this nature should be approved... or ban the idea of these separate articles, entirely. it's opens the door to unfair behaviour, and goes far beyond what an actual valid encyclopedia would include in the first place.
no, i did not vote liberal, and i still find this article insulting to my intelligence.
- The guy seems notable to me... SoothingR 21:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Marcgodbout.jpg
editImage:Marcgodbout.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)