Talk:Map coloring

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Map coloring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130128203212/http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/k21322887672u72t/ to http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/k21322887672u72t/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Article split

This article is about cartography and mathematics simultaneously, which are two entirely separate concepts. I would say that this is probably cause for a split. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 23:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't see enough content to justify splitting these concepts, and this would only result in one stub-size article. +mt 20:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

I know it's been over a year, but I just wanna say that the size of the article doesn't really matter. According to WP:STUBDEF, a small article can be fine if there's not much to say about the subject in the first place. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 17:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, go for it! +mt 01:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

I sure did try, but I ended up finding little success. Plus, I think my mind has melted a little bit now. I only have an idea of the general plan: turn this page into a disambiguation page, and move the math content to Map coloring (mathematics) and the cartography content to Map coloring (cartograpy). As for how I am supposed to do that, I've been trying to figure it out, but it is extremely confusing. I'll try calling for help. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

The mathematics of color mapping is already covered in articles about graph theory and the four color theorem. This article can probably be streamlined to better relate to those articles, but I don't think it warrants a new article. Curran919 (talk) 22:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Oppose. I agree with Curran919. The mathematics section here is basically a tip that there is a mathematical theory, with WP links to relevant articles. That seems sufficient for this article, which is (appropriately) mainly about cartography. Zaslav (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I've refocused the article on the cartography concept and redirected the reader to the math concept with a hatnote. fgnievinski (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)