Talk:Manuel Trujillo Durán

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MX in topic GA Review
Good articleManuel Trujillo Durán has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 13, 2019Good article nomineeListed
May 30, 2020Good topic candidateNot promoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 11, 2019.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that for nearly 100 years, people thought Manuel Trujillo Durán introduced cinema to Venezuela, though he was just a film technician at the time?
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Manuel Trujillo Durán/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 17:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Will review! Stay put. MX () 17:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lead paragraph edit

  • Size – I think it should be at least 4 sentences, but not more than one paragraph given the size of the article. Please expand on the major points.
  • References – Why don't you remove the references from the lead and add his DOB/POB in a section called "Early life"? I also think it would be good if you incorporate his death date and place somewhere in the body.

Infobox edit

  • Notable works – If they are notable, why aren't they mentioned in the body paragraphs? I would love this info somewhere in the sections, which a short description on why they were impactful/important. Information in the infoboxes is generally recommended to be cited and mentioned elsewhere in the body paragraphs, per WP:INFOBOXCITE

Photography edit

  • "El rayo de luz" photo studio – Strong suggestion, but I would add the English translation too in parenthesis.
  • Here, he would produce and develop images for his magazine of the same name from 1897. – From 1897 to what year? Or do you mean "starting in 1897"?
  • It is suggested that he built the studio himself, as he was eager and attentive to carpentry. – Who suggested this? For simplicity, I would simply removed the "it is suggested" and simply state the facts as is.
  • He also founded the Gutenberg newspaper. – What's the name of the newspaper? The Gutenburg?
  • In the 1897 Commercial Directory of American Republics, his registered profession is photographer. – "... In the 1897 Commercial Directory of American Republics, his registered profession was photographer", or something of that nature.

Film pioneering edit

  • Trujillo was a photographer by trade and an associate of Luis Manuel Méndez – I would recommend a brief description of who Mr. Méndez is. A simple "... an associate of film technician Luis Manuel Méndez", for example, helps.
  • For many years[note 1] it was believed that Trujillo had brought the technology to Venezuela himself – Instead of putting "it was believed" (which may trigger an "According to whom?" tag), I would recommend saying that "... film scholars believed that ..."
  • and this still appears in some records – What are your thoughts on putting this as a footnote? It disrupts the flow a bit, but it is important to keep this fact somewhere. Now, I would recommend removing the "still" and specifying what dates. "Still" can get outdated, per MOS:NOW.
  • but as film scholarship appeared in the nation records showed Méndez to have been the man who got the film projector in New York City. – Awkward phrasing, consider rephrasing.
  • It is perhaps fortunate that Méndez brought the technology to Maracaibo, – The world "fortunate" may be considered a WP:WEASEL word. Consider rephrasing this sentence and the flow of the rest.

Legacy edit

  • Though it is generally now agreed that Trujillo – "Now" can be outdated per MOS:NOW; rephrase
  • it is still a widespread belief in the nation that he did make the first Venezuelan films in 1897. – Ditto with "still"; I would also change "nation" to "country", since nation is a completely different term that what I think you mean.
  • In an article, film scholar Arturo Serrano discusses this – Better rephrased to: "Film scholar Arturo Serrano wrote an article that discussed this ..."
  • This hasn't stopped Trujillo from becoming a legend in Venezuela Change "hasn't" to "did not"; and I would recommend changing "legend" to "icon", since it is more neutral and encyclopedic. I couldn't find any reference to this in the source, however. Is there a specific statement that mentions this?

References edit

  • Serrano, Arturo. "The Beginnings of Cinema in Venezuela: The arrival of Cinema in Venezuela (1896–1907)". Retrieved 14 December 2018. – Needs publisher.
  • Zulia State Council. "Historia de Manuel Trujillo Durán". Consejo Legislativo del Zulia. Retrieved 27 October 2017. – Needs the (in Spanish) template format
  • Villalobos Finol, Orlando (July 2013). "La casa de la bahía. Memorias de Manuel Trujillo Durán, PDVSA, Maracaibo, Venezuela" (PDF). Quórum Académico. 10 (2): 343–344. – Same here
  • Antillano, Laura (20 November 2016). "Homenaje a Manuel Trujillo Durán". Notitarde. Archived from the original on 28 October 2017. Retrieved 27 October 2017. – Same here
  • Izaguirre, Rodolfo (1984). La integración cinematográfica iberoamericana. La utopía al alcance de los cineastas (PDF) (73 ed.). NUEVA SOCIEDAD. p. 85. Retrieved 15 December 2018. – Same here, and remove the CAPS from the publisher
  • Iribarren. "IRIBARREN Films: Érase una vez unos muchachos bañándose en la laguna de Maracaibo". IRIBARREN Films. Retrieved 12 September 2019. – Same here with the (in Spanish) template format
  • Carro, Nelson (1997). "Un siglo de cine en América Latina". Política y Cultura (8): 242. Retrieved 15 December 2018. – Same here
  • "FESTIVAL DEL CORTOMETRAJE NACIONAL MANUEL TRUJILLO DURÁN INICIO". Festival Manuel Trujillo Durán website (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 December 2018. – Remove SHOUTING

Response edit

@MX: - thanks for the review, I have actioned everything mentioned, and built up the page more. What do you think? Kingsif (talk) 23:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Satisfied with the changes done! I've copyedited the article a bit, too. Please review and feel free to change anything you don't see fit. I'm passing the article now. MX () 15:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply