Talk:Manchester (UK Parliament constituency)

Election Results Source

Normally when I add election results I can depend on my sources 100% In this case however I have grave doubts as to the accuracy of the Manchester City online archive, epecially the info on the 1830's. It has clearly been added online by some one who appears not to understand what the information they are adding means, so what you see currently is rather more a historians 'interpretation' of a jumble of names and and numbers. Having said that I think I have them correctly listed but if any one out there has more 'reliable' info please ammend accordingly. Galloglass 11:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Manchester's Medieval MPs - were there any?

I'm sure I read somewhere that Manchester was represented in a very early parliament - perhaps in 1265, 1275 or 1283? Does anyone know?

Ned of the Hills 217.155.193.205 (talk) 14:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

There were no MP's for Manchester until the 1832 Great Reform Act enfranchised the city. Before this electors would have voted in the county franchise for Lancashire from 1290 until 1832. I hope this answers your question. Cheers - Galloglass 15:13, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Gosh you got back very quickly! Some years ago I mentioned to one of Manchester's blue badge guides Manchester had not elected MPs until 1832. He maintained it had done. I have McKisack's book "Parliamentary Representation of English Boroughs in the Middle Ages" - Manchester isn't mentioned. So where I thought I read Manchester had elected MPs in the Meiddle Ages I just don't know. Just one instance would explain the blue badge guide's contention. 1275 would be a likely year as an exceptional number of boroughs were called on to elect representatives in that year - including Birmingham which never did so again until 1832. McKisack mentions Birmingham's representation - but as I say says naught of Manchester.

Ned of the Hills 217.155.193.205 (talk) 16:55, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Not Medieval MPs but Cromwellian MPs!

There is a footnote in Erskine May's "The Constitutional History of England Since the Accession of George the Third" which states: "In 1653, Cromwell disfranchised many small boroughs, increased the number of county members, and enfranchised Manchester, Leeds, and Halifax,—a testimony at once to his statesmanship, and to the anomalies of a representation which were not corrected for near1y 200 years...."

Cromwell's reforms I believe were scrapped just before the Restoration. So Manchester's earliest MPs would have been twixt 1653 and 1660.

Ned of the Hills (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manchester (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060520143104/http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1900.htm to http://www.manchester.gov.uk/elections/archive/gen1900.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)