This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The information on genealogy.com seems to have been lifted from somwhere else, to judge by high page numbers included in it. I wonder where? Might just be Uncle Joe's Family History Manuscript, or might be something more reliable. I tried googling a couple of phrases with no result. Interesting. PamD 15:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't think we should be using this given that Long demonstrates its unreliability (conflating two people). Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
One thing to consider here is that it is not Wikipedia editors potentially inventing Malvina Latour, but book authors. Herbert Asbury's book provides several pages of detail on Latour. While Long's research indicates Latour may not exist, I think both perspectives should be in article on Latour, and I have put back Asbury's book information back into the article on Latour and clarified who is saying what about Latour. DaffodilOcean (talk) 13:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This book's glossary, with separate listings for "Lala" and "Malvina Latour", implies that the two are separate people. How do we know that the two are the same? Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
