Talk:Malva

Untitled

The generic boundaries between Malva, Lavatera and Althaea are uncertain, but to the best of my knowledge there are currently 26 species placed in the genus, incuding several recently transferred from Lavatera. When the dust settles there could be as few as 20 or as many as 45 species. There are probably additionally a number of names in Malva where the correct identify of the plant isn't known. S.R. Hinsley, 158.152.112.82 22:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I believe that the fruit of the Common Mallow is referred to by children as "cheesies" based on their tiny cheesewheel appearance.

New Species List

• Malva bakeri (sic) should be Malva microphylla - ref. Lagascalia 26.
• Malva dendromorpha and Malva eriocalyx are synonyms - Lagascalia 26 seems to say that Malva veneta is the correct name for this species (long known as Lavatera arborea. The last predates Malva fastuosa.
• Malva linnaei and Malva psuedolavatera are synonyms - both replacing Lavatera cretica.
• Malva durieui (replacing Lavatera mauritanica) is missing
• Malva wigandii (replaced Lavatera maritima) is missing - but it is alleged that Malva subovata is the correct name for this species.
• Lavatera abyssinica should be there, but I don't know of any published name in Malva for that species.
• If you're taking the African Plant Database as authoritative Malva subacaulis should be included.
• The Californian species (Mm. assurgentiflora, lindsayi, occidentalis and pacifica) are missing
• There's three more species given in Flora Iranica (Mm. bucharica, pamiroaltaica and leonardii)
• Malva australiana (or behriana) (replacing Lavatera plebeia) is missing.
• I'd reject 7 of the species listed.

The relevant page at Malvaceae Info is the Malva alliance page, but it seems like it's time for me do another revision of that page, and add a nomenclatural review. I hadn't done the list of Malva species myself because I would have been committing original research. Lavateraguy 21:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The line between original research and ordinary editing (such as deciding which sources to cite) can be a fine one, and there are plenty of cases of nomenclature where wikipedia should follow rather than lead. But in those cases where the sources are there (Lagascalia, African Plant Database, you'd know better than I), sure, we should reflect them (with suitable footnotes). It would also be OK to have our list be a partial one, especially if the state of scholarship on this genus makes it hard to construct a complete, reliable list. Kingdon 17:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

The sources aren't consistent.

• An Italian paper sinks Lavatera in Malva, but there's no name in Malva for the later described Lavatera valdesii. Other's don't. There may be no names in Malva for other species (not found in Italy).
• There are at least 4 species (ex Lavatera) that have different names in different sources.
• Some sources accept segregate species that others reject. For example the Flora of Pakistan cited accepts four species that other sources reduce to synonymy with other species. (There's a 5th species there which is a new name to me, but I'd be tempted to consider that a synonym as well).

Lavateraguy 19:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Seinfeld

This was discussed on the Jerry Seinfeld program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PointyHairedEE (talk • contribs) 22:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malva. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506210831/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?7216 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?7216

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)