Talk:Mallorquín

Help with source

I would like to read the article cited in an earlier version of this page, Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Pla JL, Vallejo M, Dunner S |title=The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data |journal=Anim. Genet. |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=39–48 |year=2000 |month=February |pmid=10690360|url=, but don't have Athens log-in at present. Could some kind soul help?
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Drop me an email through Wikipedia and I'll send you a copy. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Balearic Pony?

Is there a Balearic Pony? The Mallorquín averages 1.61 m, according to the Spanish government. Swedish Wikipedia has this page on a Balearic pony 1.45 m tall. My Swedish is a bit rusty. Can anyone help?
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Pitke speaks some Swedish and may be able to help. Also keep in mind that a breed may change a bit if removed from its native land. On top of that, as in the case of, for example, the Icelandic horse, there may be considerable disagreement over whether to call an animal a horse or a pony. On wiki, we tend to go with whatever the leading breed experts prefer, though if there is a legitimate controversy, we will "teach the controversy" too, like the Slovenia vs. Austria thing with the Lipizzan. (Slovenia actually filed a lawsuit with the EU wanting to be the only country that could use the name "Lipizzan." I believe they lost). Montanabw^(talk) 18:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Might this sort of stuff not seem just a tad offensive to people from those countries who happen by here? Personally, I find this kind of inter-national argumentation tedious and unpleasant, as I have already had reason to mention. As is the idea of teaching anyone controversy.

Back to the Malloquín: it's in Mallorca, its native land, so that one won't fly. I was hoping to attract an answer from someone who either knows Swedish, or knows something about the subject, two descriptions that definitely don't fit me, but may well fit Pitke.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, "teaching the controversy" is often necessary here on Wikipedia, whether you find it tedious or not. European breeds often seem to attract much of the controversy, for some reason, although American breeds do it too. When there is a legitimate disagreement between two sides, Wikipedia has to present both - it cannot pick on side or the other. Such is the case with Andalusian horse, which I have taken through FAC despite a multiple lawsuit-inducing argument between multiple breed registries as to exactly what the breed is called and how pure it is. We cannot just say that one side or the other is correct, we have to explain both sides, discuss the lawsuit and leave it up to the reader to draw a conclusion. Anything else is our opinion, which cannot be used. Dana boomer (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mallorquín. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110116095447/http://www.mapa.es/app/Zootecnia/Fichas.aspx?pag=EquinaMallorquin to http://www.mapa.es/app/Zootecnia/Fichas.aspx?pag=EquinaMallorquin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mallorquín. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322102055/http://aplicaciones.mapa.es/arca-webapp/descarga/fichero.html?nombre=Mallorquin_%20orden%2012%20junio%202003.pdf to http://aplicaciones.mapa.es/arca-webapp/descarga/fichero.html?nombre=Mallorquin_%20orden%2012%20junio%202003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322102055/http://aplicaciones.mapa.es/arca-webapp/descarga/fichero.html?nombre=Mallorquin_%20orden%2012%20junio%202003.pdf to http://aplicaciones.mapa.es/arca-webapp/descarga/fichero.html?nombre=Mallorquin_%20orden%2012%20junio%202003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)