Talk:Malacology

Mattheus Marinus Schepman

We need help from a Gastropologist and/or Malacologist at Mattheus Marinus Schepman. New aricle. Should be worth a WP:DYK easily, if we can get this up to 1500 characters. I found 40 "See also's" by ptyping ""Schepman" intol wikipedia, and that was just the first 40. Just a beginning. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Malacology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100322225631/http://www.ansp.org/museum/digital_collections/shells/bounanni.php to http://www.ansp.org/museum/digital_collections/shells/bounanni.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091026053807/http://sandiegoshellclub.com/PracFestivus.html to http://www.sandiegoshellclub.com/PracFestivus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Malacology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150717023402/http://www.spirula.nl/publicaties/e_basteria.htm to http://www.spirula.nl/publicaties/e_basteria.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110826040030/http://rfems.dvo.ru/bulletin/e_main.htm to http://rfems.dvo.ru/bulletin/e_main.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201043235/http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~polmal/folia/folia.htm to http://www.staff.amu.edu.pl/~polmal/folia/folia.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718214454/http://www.conchbooks.de/contents/en-us/p342.html to http://www.conchbooks.de/contents/en-us/p342.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

List of museum collections

• I fail to see the evidentiary basis for some of these entries. I'm pretty sure that the Natural History Museum in London and the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris have huge collections of molluscs, far in excess of some of the museums listed. I can't see the point of making vacuous claims. Either there is evidence or there is not. If there is not, we should not say it. Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)