This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The first sentence of the Wiki article says MVM is a political pressure group. Shouldn't this say "a democracy pressure group"? MVM assiduously avoids preference or support for any political party. It is completely focused on bringing about a Westminster voting system that will ensure each party's parliamentary seats will closely mirror the proportion of votes they receive, so the voters will get the parliament they collectively voted for. MVM actively promotes this idea across the entire political spectrum, from the Reform Party to the Trade Unions, including all the political parties in between. Their goal is votes of equal impact for every voter and a level playing field for the political parties to compete on in general elections. This is about a better democracy, not politics. It therefore seems misleading to call MVM 'political'. In the everyday sense of the word 'political', that is not true. Micjawber (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}