Talk:Make Room for Lisa/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruby2010 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 15:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
No images anyway, so we're golden
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • Wikilink the characters in the plot section (Marge, Homer etc)
  • Remember to have sentences with quotes end with citations

That's really it. Nice work! As always, I'll place the review on hold for seven days, though I know you'll get to it before then :) Ruby2010 comment! 15:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think I've fixed all the problems now. As always, thanks for the review! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. Pass for GA. Ruby2010 comment! 16:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Reply