Talk:Major Diagnostic Category

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

MDC with MS-DRG edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Description of MDC (Major Diagnostic Categories) in this Wikipedia entry pertains ONLY to the DRG (Diagnosis Related Groups) classification system for inpatient stays, in which 25 MDC categories are defined, as listed. However, there is a separate (and prior) definition of MDC (Major Diagnostic Categories) which identifies 19 MDC categories which was defined and employed for grouping illness conditions defined in the much more widely adopted ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification). User: anw03 09:17, 17 September 2009 (HST)

CMS DRG (and MS-DRG) use ICD-9-CM. I can't speak to use of MDC outside of that. - Denimadept (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

US Specific? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I disagree with the description of MDCs and DRGs as "unique to the United States" and its medical reimbursement system. I work in health data (at the moment - hopefully not forever) for an organisation in Australia, and we make use of MDCs and DRGs in our reports. I don't claim expertise in this, so if anyone could point out where I might be wrong, I'd be grateful. 203.13.3.92 (talk) 03:56, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Where do they get it? If from the US, it's still US-centric, as it's designed for US Medicare/Medicaid. - Denimadept (talk) 07:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic