Talk:Majestic, Leeds
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
 | A fact from Majestic, Leeds appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 October 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
( )
... that following being gutted by a major fire in 2014, the former Majestic Cinema, Leeds, has now become the national headquarters of Channel 4?ALT1:... that the former Majestic Cinema, Leeds, was gutted by fire straight after conversion and refurbishment in 2014?
- Reviewed: Forbidden Area (Playhouse 90)
5x expanded by Rcsprinter123 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC).
Hi Rcsprinter123, just started to take a look at this one. I'll continue looking at it but for now I note the final two sentences in the article aren't referenced? - Dumelow (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- 5x expansion from 14 September confirmed; barring the above citations seem to be in order, though preferably there should be page numbers for Cook and the Heritage Statement. Is the heritage statement not available online, perhaps as part of the planning application? I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing; hooks are interesting; I have some issues with verifying the hooks, for ALT1 I can't see that the 2014 Yorkshire Evening Post article verifies that the refurbishment was complete at the time of the fire (indeed much of the first paragraph of the "Fire and redevelopment" section does not appear in the source and needs to be checked); for ALT0 the article states that Channel 4 have yet to move in? - Dumelow (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, Dumelow. Last sentences now covered by Yorkshire Post source. The heritage statement and officer's report are available online, but do not have a stable link; they have to be accessed through the planning portal. This was explained on a hidden note, but I've moved it into the citation to make access easier for readers. Unfortunately, said portal seems to be down tonight, but I think that a lot of the fire paragraph and ALT1 is sourced from the heritage statement on there. I will have to try again tomorrow to source that better and get page numbers. As for ALT0, I don't have anything up-to-date enough to say Channel 4 have moved in, but I would say being confirmed by multiple sources as anchor tenant counts as becoming the headquarters for the purposes of the hook? Alternatively, publication of the DYK could hold until C4 are using it. Rcsprinter123 (comment) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rcsprinter123, I think that's OK re: the report but are you able to add page numbers, I imagine it's rather lengthy? For ALT0 we could just change it to "will become the national headquarters of Channel 4" - Dumelow (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say that Public Access, the planning portal, still seems to be down for essential maintenance so I can't get that paragraph sorted out yet. I support the change to ALT0, if we have "will soon become". Rcsprinter123 (dialogue) 21:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Dumelow. With it being back online, I've taken a look at the source added an extra citation on the paragraph covering the parts which use it, and added the page number range. Rcsprinter123 (relate) 22:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Rcsprinter123, I think that's OK re: the report but are you able to add page numbers, I imagine it's rather lengthy? For ALT0 we could just change it to "will become the national headquarters of Channel 4" - Dumelow (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, Dumelow. Last sentences now covered by Yorkshire Post source. The heritage statement and officer's report are available online, but do not have a stable link; they have to be accessed through the planning portal. This was explained on a hidden note, but I've moved it into the citation to make access easier for readers. Unfortunately, said portal seems to be down tonight, but I think that a lot of the fire paragraph and ALT1 is sourced from the heritage statement on there. I will have to try again tomorrow to source that better and get page numbers. As for ALT0, I don't have anything up-to-date enough to say Channel 4 have moved in, but I would say being confirmed by multiple sources as anchor tenant counts as becoming the headquarters for the purposes of the hook? Alternatively, publication of the DYK could hold until C4 are using it. Rcsprinter123 (comment) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- 5x expansion from 14 September confirmed; barring the above citations seem to be in order, though preferably there should be page numbers for Cook and the Heritage Statement. Is the heritage statement not available online, perhaps as part of the planning application? I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing; hooks are interesting; I have some issues with verifying the hooks, for ALT1 I can't see that the 2014 Yorkshire Evening Post article verifies that the refurbishment was complete at the time of the fire (indeed much of the first paragraph of the "Fire and redevelopment" section does not appear in the source and needs to be checked); for ALT0 the article states that Channel 4 have yet to move in? - Dumelow (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Rcsprinter123: It's been almost two weeks since you started this nomination. Have you accomplished a QPQ yet? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5: I'm so sorry, I forgot that that's what we were waiting for. QPQ review is linked above. That'll teach me to submit a nomination at bedtime. Rcsprinter123 (pitch) 12:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. @Dumelow: Can you please take another look at this? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I've been away on holiday and forgot about this review. Happy to approve the following ALT, as discussed above - Dumelow (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)- ALT2: ... that following being gutted by a major fire in 2014, the former Majestic Cinema, Leeds, will become the national headquarters of Channel 4?
- Thanks. @Dumelow: Can you please take another look at this? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5: I'm so sorry, I forgot that that's what we were waiting for. QPQ review is linked above. That'll teach me to submit a nomination at bedtime. Rcsprinter123 (pitch) 12:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}