I think this page should be merged into the Citizenship Amendment Act protests. Pinging DBigXray, DiplomatTesterMan. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- I don't think so, its about the poem, just like Solitary Reaper, Inquilab Zindabad, Sarfaroshi Ki Tamanna, Jana Gana Mana. Its not about protest. Poem will be used age after ages. Dey subrata (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Kautilya3, why ? Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 21:59, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- We can't do WP:CRYSTAL. If the poem's only notability is in connection with the protests, then it should go there. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Again I want to tell you this article is about the poem. Similary every revolutionary or political poem or songs are used and will be used somewhere for the first time. But it does not mean it will only be used in that occasion only.
- Secondly, as in the Slogans and poems section in CAA protest article, as mentioned there are several poems which are added, were used in some other time in history and in totally different kind of protest. In the lead its not written its notability is about CAA protest. Such poem are used again and again in several protests for generations. Thats why its mentioned it was used during the protest and is a political poem (but not a CAA protest poem only)
- Thirdly, stanzas and phrases of poem if separately taken, gives individual meaning for a individual protest, like in this case upto..."I refuse to be frightened by this fear, I refuse to die an untimely death !" can be used in different protest or occasion. National Anthem of India also use first stanza of the song. So its not about notability for a single protest.
- Lastly, if we think of merging, then how can it be possible that the whole poem can be put there in the CAA protest article. I think its very fine in present condition. And finally the poem is about popularity also as its gone viral after the video released. Dey subrata (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Dey subrata, WP:CRYSTAL says Wikipedia does not speculate about the future. As of now, it is a poem of CAA protests and its notability is completely subsumed by that of the protests. There isn't an extraordinary amount of content to be written about it to warrant an independent article. So, it is currently a WP:POVFORK, which is prohibited. Please consider putting the text of the poem on Wikisource. It is not encyclopaedic content. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Dey subrata, would this article survive an AFD nom? (This is just an honest thought and nothing else.) DTM (talk) 06:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Dey subrata Why do you want a fresh article for this when the references that directly deal with this are so few. The :Citizenship_Amendment_Act_protests#Slogans_and_poems section has come out so nicely!.... let it be a part of that. DTM (talk) 06:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
