Untitled edit

I added this page because I believe MailChannels fits the "noteworthiness" requirement for a company page. The company's technology was recognized by several independent sources as being a significant advance in anti-spam -- for example, the MIT Spam Conference, the former CTO of Lotus, and the Washington Post newspaper. For an example of another similar company that has a page on Wikipedia, see TurnTide. Thanks, Ken. Ken.simpson.mailchannels 19:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also, numerous other pages on Wikipedia point to the MailChannels page. It therefore seems reasonable to me that such a page should exist. Please feel free to improve the neutrality of the article, but don't just add it to the delete queue. Ken.simpson.mailchannels 19:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. The technology might be notable, but I don't think the company is... You own the company, don't you? Have a look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest - you shouldn't really have created the article in the first place! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 03:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. I'm going to AfD this, and see what happens. Feel free to dicuss it there, but familiarise yourself with WP:N first! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 09:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MailChannels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MailChannels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Observed Propensity for On-line Bullying: the MulhollandRaceway.org Incident edit

Advancement of anti-spam code generating ever increasingly greater false positives is observed to positively correlate with Mailchannel.com's ever increasingly tendency, of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. As small, independent web sites increasingly generating trouble tickets tests the patience of Mailchannel's staff, Mailchannels executives are increasingly observed to confer upon themselves Carte Blanche, an imperous Master's of the Universe Mentality, directing personnel to arbitrarily single-out and block outgoing electronic mail they know not to be SPAM, bullying small, independent web sites with the audacity to push back, stand up to Mailchannels abuse, and report false positives - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.83.78 (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply