Talk:Mai Chen
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.JPG)
discussion
editthis article says at the top Mai Chen was born in 1964, and further into the article that she was born in 1963... which one is it?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.180.109.42 (talk) 07:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Given that you can't be 6 years old in 1970 when you were born in 1963, I'll change it to 1964. Schwede66 14:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Still working for the EMA? (222.155.164.85 (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC))
"Given that you can't be 6 years old in 1970 when you were born in 1963 . . ." actually she could - if her birthday is later in the year than the date at which she visited NZ on, she would still be 6 when she visited us [by western counting - not by some chinese birthday counting systems, though] GHSinclair (talk) 07:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
delete this person's entry
editis this person noteworthy enough to need an entry on Wikipedia ? - in NZ we have many people far more deserving of inclusion. This entry really just sounds & seems like a self-serving self promotion.
I vote for its deletion. GHSinclair (talk) 07:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)