Talk:Mahika Sharma
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unreliable sources
editThese are all unreliable sources.
- Magicalassam.com
- Indiaopines.com
- Bollywoodlife.com
- Sulekha.com
- Goassam.com
- Entertainment-tadka.com
- santabanta.com
- just-showbiz.com
- justbollywood.in
- Indiainfoline.com
- Tellychakkar.com
- Pinkvilla.com
- Tellytadka.net
- partidintime.blogspot.in
- bollywooddhamaka.in
- tellymasala.co.in
- evaweekly.com
- moviesamachar.com
- starsunfolded.com
- biratonline.com
—- Managerarc™ talk 04:49, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
If those are unreliable sources. Then why dont wiki ban those sites. As *India forums links are ban here. Links from popular sites are always welcome here. Wikipedia is for all and most of the links likes Maggical Assam is top blog around northeast and so is Tellychakkar and Bollywoodlife in tellydom in India. So as per me the issue is not appropriate. Many pages are just alive on bollywoodlife and tellychakkar too. Indianeditor22 (talk) 05:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please take a look at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist. Only spammers are blacklisted. Regarding reliable sources, please see the "Guidelines on sources" section on WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force for a list of sources considered reliable. If you think above sources meet the reliability criteria at WP:RS, please develop consensus first. - Managerarc™ talk 19:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
As noted, the sources you use must bereliable; that is, they must be sources that exercise some form of editorial control and have some reputation for fact checking and accuracy. Wikipedia justify those sites which carry editor controll... the sites u reffer to be unreliable its not east for normal man to get publish over till they are notable. So its justify that we can reffer those sites in an article with many reliable sites, such as Times of India, Hindustan Times, The states man and few more. So kindly remove your issue tag. Thanks I appriciate you look for reliable sources in an article to avoid vendalism over wikipedia. Indianeditor22 (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- The tag would not be removed unless all the unreliable sources are removed and/or replaced with reliable sources. - Managerarc™ talk 13:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Added few sources
editI have heard a lot about the actress. Since took the initiative to add few good sources I found on her. Lily Flingg (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)