Talk:Magneto-inertial fusion

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've started the magneto-inertial fusion page. Is there consensus on the distinction between MIF and MTF? The description of MTF given on magnetized target fusion is what I would call "solid-liner magnetized target fusion". The name suggests the distinction is in the target - perhaps an organized target plasma? One can also imagine a disorganized seed magnetic field or magnetic field carried in with the liner. Plasma liners are also being studied, and IIRC, General Dynamics is looking at pistons to provide compression rather than the faster-compression FRX-L approach. Should these other approaches be described under MIF or MTF? Both?SMesser (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic