Talk:Magia (Shakira album)/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Pedro João in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pedro João (talk · contribs) 19:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'll be reviewing this. Hopefully I won't take a lot of time with this, because the article looks good overall.

Infobox

edit
  • "June 1991" → replace with June 24, 1991 (we do have an actual release date for this)
    •   Done
  • Genres → where are the sources for these?

Lead

edit

Development and composition

edit
  • "dreams of becoming a young coastal girl" → just like in the lead, I don't understand this expression of 'coastal girl'.
  • "A Sony Music Columbia representative said that the recording process was simple and went perfectly fine. For Shakira, the process was problematic" → "A Sony Music Columbia representative claimed that the recording process was simple and went perfectly fine, although, for Shakira, the process was problematic"

Release and promotion

edit

References

edit
  • The reference that links to Eli should come in Template:Cite web formatting.
  • For the references that cite the book, you need to replace them with the Template:Cite book formatting, I think.
    • No. Again, formatting using templates is not essential to a good article. What guideline do you remember seeing this? 和DITOREtails 21:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
      • This is my first GA review, and since in another article that I nominated and was reviewed I had to substitute all of the references with templates. I'm sorry though!

Putting this on hold for now. prism 19:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply