Talk:Maghrawa

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Elinruby in topic really garbled translation

Merger proposal edit

The newer article Maghrawid Dynasty covers a lot of the ground already included in thus article - I don’t think we need two separate articles. Mccapra (talk) 23:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

They do look like two tiny articles with greatly overlapping scope. At least part of the Maghrawid Dynasty article appears to have been directly copied from this one. CMD (talk) 09:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, this is pretty close to an unnecessary content fork for a topic that can be covered on one page at the moment. R Prazeres (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have merged the pages. CMD (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

reliable source concern edit

Looks to me like a Google Books fail, and possibly a confusion between publisher and printer. This is a reprint of a historic book originally published by Ernest Leroux [fr], a venerable and highly respectable publisher. The age of the source may create POV concerns about colonialism, but it is being used here for ancient history, and there is no reason to suppose that the reprint was altered. The French take old books and history *extremely* seriously, and I am fairly certain it would not have made its way onto Google Books if it was a hoax somehow. Elinruby (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

really garbled translation edit

will take some time to untangle Elinruby (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply