Talk:Maewa Kaihau

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Krisgabwoosh in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Maewa Kaihau
  • ... that New Zealand composer Maewa Kaihau (pictured) sold her rights to the song "Now is the Hour" for £10, a decade before it became a hit in the United Kingdom and United States? Source: [1] is the source for the 1935 sale of the rights for £10; [2] [3] are sources for the overseas success of the song in the 1940s.

Created by Chocmilk03 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • {{doing}} Beginning review now. Zingarese talk · contribs (please use {{reply to|Zingarese}} on reply; thanks!) 11:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment (no review): any aspect of a subject that appears on DYK must also be included in the article about that subject. In this case, the hook fact must be added to the article (or a different hook proposed), and the image either added to the article or removed from this nomination. In my opinion, the image is fine as is for DYK. Mindmatrix 14:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Mindmatrix: thanks for taking a look! Just to clarify, do you mean that the hook & image need to be added to "Now Is the Hour (song)" as well? They're already in Maewa Kaihau which is the article that I'm looking to nominate (at least, the image definitely is and I think the hook is). Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 19:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Chocmilk03: Nah, I goofed. I completely missed the link to the subject and only saw the one for "Now Is the Hour (song)", which I interpreted to be the subject. So, uh, just ignore me. Mindmatrix 19:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Mindmatrix: ahaha, phew. I initially thought that was the case then started overthinking it wondering if there was an obscure DYK rule I had missed somewhere. :D Chocmilk03 (talk) 19:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  •   New enough; long enough; great sourcing; no copyvio obvious; wonderful hook on good sources; image is fine; QPQ done. Good to go. Great work! Zingarese talk · contribs (please use {{reply to|Zingarese}} on reply; thanks!) 01:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Zingarese: brilliant, many thanks! :) Chocmilk03 (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply