This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Removed the statement 'One condo unit, with a floor area of 1,400,000 sq ft (130,000 m2), will cost USD$ 4 million.' This looked like a misinterpretation of the reference, which was talking about the impact of the new building on the monthly rents of nearby existing buildings. Anyway, a condo unit is not 1.4M square feet, and if it were, it would definitely not cost or rent for $4M in New York. Willhsmit (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The weakest thing about this article it that, as far as has been reported, the proposal for these towers was dropped some time ago, when the Dolans, owners of MSG decided to renovate the current building instead of moving to a new one. See here. In short, the article is seriously outdated, as are various article linked to this one which draw upon its info, which reflects very badly on the wiki as a whole. oknazevad (talk) 05:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
