Talk:Madison, Nebraska

"Geography" heading

I've reversed an edit that changed the text "U.S. Highway 81" to "U.S. Route 81", and that called for citations for Madison's location near the intersection of two highways and for Madison's elevation.

Citations: These are highly non-controversial facts, and I question whether citations are necessary. I could supply one easily for the elevation (the same document from which I got the material in the "Economy" heading), but I question the necessity or even the desirability of a footnote at the end of that sentence. I'm not sure how to provide a citation for the location near the highway intersection-- I know it because I grew up in Madison and return frequently (in fact, I'm there as I type this). Again, there's nothing controversial about the fact, and I question the desirability of a footnote.

Re. Highway 81: The article United States Numbered Highways says: "...(often called U.S. Routes or U.S. Highways)". "Highway 81" is the common usage in Nebraska. I think "Route 81" is more generally used in the eastern U.S. (and from his contribution history, I suspect that the editor who changed "Highway" to "Route" may live in that part of the country). Since my original "Highway 81" was the first use of either form in the article, and since it's the locally preferred usage, I've reverted to it. --Ammodramus (talk) 16:38, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Belatedly: One possible reason why highways in this part of Nebraska aren't described as "Route 99" is that until recently, many people had their mail delivered on rural routes. "Route 1" meant "RR1", not "Highway 1". --Ammodramus (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

We need citations for everything we write. If you don't have a reference, how am I to check that the elevation is precisely what you say? If you have these sources, it should be easy to cite them, and there's never anything wrong with adding a reference. Since you're in the vicinity often: you should be able to visit the local library and cite a good atlas. Try using {{Cite book}}, or simply take this citation (for a different atlas) and replace the author name, atlas title, and publication information respectively.

<ref>DeLorme. ''Kansas Atlas & Gazetteer''. 4th ed. [[Yarmouth, Maine|Yarmouth]]: [[DeLorme]], 2009, PAGE. ISBN 0-89933-342-7.</ref>

The article is entitled U.S. Route 81, not U.S. Highway 81. There's presumably a good reason that the article is at this title, and I see no good reason why we shouldn't use its actual name. FYI, I live in Ohio, where we talk about "U.S. Route 68" or "U.S. Route 224"—well, some of us do; tons of people near where I live ignorantly call them "State Route 68" or "State Route 224"; you can even find official road signs for "State Route 68"!—rather than "U.S. Highway 68" or "U.S. Highway 224". That's immaterial to my reasons; if the articles were entitled "Highway", I'd seek to have Ohio geography articles refer to these roads as "U.S. Highway __". Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I'll defer to you as a senior editor on the subject of citations, though from my reading of Wikipedia:Citing_sources, this doesn't seem to be a situation where they're required.

Note that the elevation and the major employers come from the same source, though from different pages. Can you suggest a way of getting an abbreviated footnote for that second citation?

Re. US81: I suspect that the reason the article is at U.S. Route 81 is that it was originally written by someone for whom "Route 99" was the local usage-- someone from Ohio, say. However, the Manual of Style seems to indicate that I should accept that name in this article-- at least until I've argued for a change to U.S. Highway 81 in the discussion page for that article...

Re. DeLorme: I've got that atlas for Nebraska, and will use it as a source. It's reasonably reliable for major thoroughfares. However, as a birder I've spent lots of time on back-roads in Nebraska, and DeLorme is definitely untrustworthy there. But that's original research...

--Ammodramus (talk) 03:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Madison, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to https://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019235623/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012-3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)