Talk:Made in Dagenham

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Labour in the Media section.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

We Want Sex edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This was the name that the film was released with in Germany and was also the original name of the film (in script form) before changing to Made In Dagenham (please refer to the 07/01/11 episode of Mark Kermode and Simon Mayo's Film Reviews on BBC Radio Five Live) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.110.168 (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Historical inaccuracies? edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Just wondering, is this not a bit strong a phrase to use for the non-factual elements of the film? Inaccuracies (in my opinion) due to it connotations is usually reserved for when the film purports to be accurate, which this film doesn't - it is supposed to be a dramatisation and therefore isn't expected to be factually accurate. - Estoy Aquí (talk) 14:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Plus, the film makes clear the women worked at the River Plant in numerous ways, including the dialogue, not just the signs. It may well have been separate from the Dagenham assembly line, but it was certainly at Dagenham geographically, so the expression of this particular reservation is a bit strong. The strikers were invariably referred to at the time as the Dagenham women. I suspect the writer has not understood the pun in the film title. Sjwells53 (talk) 18:29, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is it really relevant to say 'schools now use whiteboards'? Whilst this may on the whole be true, it adds little to the article. --212.219.156.237 (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The film is set in June 1968, but Sandra's photoshoot is for the launch of the Ford Cortina Mark 2 which occurred in October 1966. Some of the cars depicted on the assembly lines are Ford Cortina Mark 1, which went out of production in 1966. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic