Deletions edit

This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

06:16, 28 May 2017 Jimfbleak (talk | contribs) deleted page Maccasio (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: no independent sources, no evidence of notability, self-written vanity page)
04:47, 28 May 2017 C.Fred (talk | contribs) deleted page Maccasio (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
00:52, 4 February 2017 Kurykh (talk | contribs) deleted page Maccasio (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maccasio closed as delete)

Requested move 12 June 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Consensus is that the name Maccasio is more appropriate; questions as to whether the article should exist can continue. Cúchullain t/c 19:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply



Maccasio (Rapper)Maccasio – Unnecessary disambiguation. Gorobay (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • blocked redlink, deleted 3x. Is he now notable? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • Probably not. Since there is no deletion request for it at the moment, I figured there was no reason not to move it. Gorobay (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • @Gorobay and In ictu oculi: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep and move. The article is sourced with external sources. When using the refimprove template one should state which part or sentence exactly requires more or better sources. How else can the writer of the article know, having already used 5 sources, which parts need improving? --Gereon K. (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Improving the references is a different issue. —  AjaxSmack  17:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • No objection if original AFD commentators do not object @SW3 5DL: In ictu oculi (talk) 08:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • No objection here. SW3 5DL (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support – If the page remains, it should obviously be at Maccasio (there's no other article with this name). Whether or not it should be deleted is an entirely separate matter, and should be taken up through those channels. V2Blast (talk) 10:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply