Talk:Macaquitos

	Association football portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Argentine football task force.

Suggest to check facts. The usage predates 1978.

Actually, suggest removing, or finding a better title. elpincha 19:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree. The term has not been used in decades. Article provides no additional information. Merge with Argentina and Brazil football rivalry. Mariano(t/c) 07:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

No Merge. Portuguese Wikipedia has the proper article. It's higly individual fact related with rivalry only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.58.112.92 (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure I understand you. It is a highly isolated point, that is only related to the football rivalry between both countries, and nothing else. Then why shouldn't all the information of this article be at the Argentina and Brazil football rivalry article?? Currently, the article provides no aditional information to that in the 'rivalry' article , and I still see no point on having a separate one. Mariano(t/c) 07:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did you readed the portuguese article? Did you readed the "Other versions" section? Lot of people in Brazil complain that is from Paraguay War, decades before the first world cup. If was migrated strong to football isn't not sufficient for erase the historycal mean of this word and their highly usage.

Not only the article lacks of any sources regarding the Paraguay War and further accurrences, but also has POV comments such as Brazil being the "moral winner" of the 1978 World Cup.

The Portuguese article is less POV, and since there's no portuguese version of the Argentina and Brazil football rivalry article, it is understandable to keep it. Mariano(t/c) 12:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Redirect macacos to this page? elpincha 06:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

No. Macacos is moneys, the animals. This is just racism-pushing.

Dubious Statement edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Some" assert that the term "Macaquitos" was first used during the War of the Triple Alliance (aka, the Paraguayan War)? Define and properly cite who those "some" people are or the statement should be removed. StudierMalMarburg (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

2008-02-4 Automated pywikipediabot message edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic