Talk:Ma Long (footballer)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) probable duplicate entry error on zh.wp and sodasoccer.com database. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


Ma Long (footballer, born 1990)Ma Long (footballer) – No other footballer called Ma Long has a page on English Wikipedia. Timmyshin (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Question - you're convinced no one should create an article for the other 马龙 born 1989 who plays for Qingdao? And none of the links to "Ma Long" in our football articles are actually mislinks to the Qingdao Ma Long? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
The one mentioned on the zh.wp dab page 中国足球运动员,1989年出生,现效力于青岛中能。 Is that the same as 中国足球运动员,1990年出生,现效力于山东鲁能泰山 ? In ictu oculi (talk) 03:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Why are you using language like "You do realize that the Ma Long who plays for Qingdao played for Shandong Luneng Taishan, right?" No I don't have to realize that when asking a question because it's your job to check this before submitting RM, as above zh.wp says they are two different players, and reliable sources such as http://sodasoccer.com/search/index.jsp also show two different players with two different photos, playing for two different Qingdao clubs - Qingdao Hainiu F.C. and Qingdao Zhongneng.
马龙(Ma Long) 角色:前卫 生日:1990-02-26 所属俱乐部:山东鲁能 Ma Long (footballer, born 1990) 青岛海牛
马龙(Ma Long) 角色:前卫 生日:1989-02-26 所属俱乐部:青岛中能 Ma Long (footballer, born 1989) In ictu oculi (talk) 01:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've bluelinked Ma Long (footballer, born 1989) as a redirect to the second Qingdao club, although still ambivalent about the actual move. Ma and Long are such common names in China that the second footballer not being notable (hence redlink on zh.wp's dab) is perhaps less of an issue than that another Ma Long will be along in a year or two. But in the intervening time ambiguating the first one, or not, isn't a big issue either way. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the insult. It was really important and really added to the RM to make another personal attack. I just pasted in the data as in the sources. Yes it almost certainly is a duplicate data entry for the same player. But you should have found that yourself before you issued the RM by doing basic checks. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Clean up

edit

Have cleaned up the zh.wp Ma Long dab page and moved to generic descriptor (footballer), (足球运动员) In ictu oculi (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ma Long (footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply