Talk:Maîtresse-en-titre

I would like to respectfully request that this page be rewritten. It starts out listing true maîtresses-en-titre, but by the time it gets to Louis XIV, it mixes informal liaisons with formally designated royal mistresses, contradicting the information given at the beginning of the article. Thanks, Bmwilcox (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree entirely. And what the heck is Mary Boleyn doing here? This isn't about whether or not she slept with the King of France; she very well might have. This is about whether she held the title. I think we would have heard about that. Darkfrog24 (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Not every royal mistress was official

Many of the royal mistresses listed in this article were "one-night stands" or even long-term liaisons, but were in no sense the king's court-acknowledged "official mistress", as the term maîtresse-en-titre implies. Since that title was never actually conferred on any woman, it must be inferred circumstantially. Women on the list should meet a set of criteria, including: 1.was she generally known at court as a mistress of the king? 2.was she regarded as the king's primary mistress? 3.did she receive titles, lands, revenues, legitimation of her bastards from the king which distinguished her from other royal mistresses? Did the king associate with her openly at court? Did she come to be accompanied at court by her own entourage of ladies, etc. FactStraight (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Merge?

This article looks like a prime candidate for a merger with List of French royal mistresses. Boneyard90 (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maîtresse-en-titre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228125103/http://enviedhistoire.canalblog.com/archives/2006/08/25/2536976.html to http://enviedhistoire.canalblog.com/archives/2006/08/25/2536976.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)