Talk:MV Sycamore

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal MV Sycamore is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

call for discussion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This edit's edit summary says: "source does not indicate any controversy - it's a tabloid story with a defensive (and later sacked for this kind of stuff) minister, but no-one criticising the decision."

The headline of one of our references, says, "Aussies ship to be built in Vietnam in major contract blow". So, why shouldn't the characterization that this "major contract blow", to the Australian shipbuilding industry, be considered a sign of controversy? Geo Swan (talk) 19:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic