Talk:MVRDV

Controversy section

i expect someone to add to the controversy section in the near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.246.79 (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

You mean you expect the controversy to grow? :) I added a reference, but for anybody working on this please be aware of due weight and avoid recentism. --Elekhh (talk) 06:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MVRDV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614115722/http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=587 to http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=587
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614115139/http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=371 to http://www.010.nl/catalogue/book.php?id=371

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Citations / Buzzwords / History

There's been a lot of work to add citations, many from non-primary sources, in this article, so I've taken the citations warning template away.

There are still a few sections where the language is abstract / buzzwordy. These need better explanation.

The history section could also be more elegant - largely a long list of projects without context at the moment

Xcia0069 (talk) 08:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Notable Works

The text of the Notable Works reads as if it's been taken direct from the firm's website Xcia0069 (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)