Talk:MT-12
Latest comment: 4 months ago by D1d2d3d29 in topic Why does this article claim that Russia using the MT-12 is signs of an ATGM shortage?
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Article name edit
The page should probably be renamed to 100 mm anti-tank gun MT-12 for reasons of consistency, but as the previous MT-12 was a redirect, I'll wait till after the review. Grieg2 (talk) 10:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Why does this article claim that Russia using the MT-12 is signs of an ATGM shortage? edit
You know that the MT-12 can fire ATGMs too right? That sentence should be removed as fast as possible D1d2d3d29 (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also even if the MT-12 couldn't fire ATGMs claiming that Russia deploying a few MT-12s is a sign of an ATGM shortage is incredibly sensationalist
- Ukraine also used the MT-12 in a direct fire role a few times yet i never saw anyone that they are running out of kit as basic as ATGMs D1d2d3d29 (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)