 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
State of ATR2 edit
This at Arcane Fighting Vehicles makes an argument that ATR2 is only hill of MBT-80 project and turret is from separate (though possibly parallel) programme. Looks like possibly speculation on MBT-80's turret FCS capability comes from the mismatch. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's an interesting theory, but I'm a bit dubious on it for the moment. It might be worth mentioning this theory in the article though. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 22:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)