This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The claim ofmost distant is incompatible with that of GN-z11. Is there an error? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- I fixed the error. According to the paper, this object is "probably the most distant representative source of reionization found to date"—not the most distant galaxy. Loooke (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)