Talk:M. S. Swaminathan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 106.78.167.57 in topic S.ST

Comments edit

This article has been completely lifted from a cached website called Trip Atlas. com. Kindly verify the authenticity and legal issues for this document. The Website is in the following link[[1]] .Venkat.athma (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC) This article has little detail on his scientific achievements. A discussion of a few of his major publications and their contribution to plant science would add greatly to the article. TimVickers 16:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) This article is more detailed than one would expect on Wikipedia. It is already well documented and more than this would hardly add to the overall importance of the person. He is a globally recognized scientist and one of the few who clearly need little introduction. We may agree or disagree with his contribution and its impact. But no one denies that it was huge. One of the very few Indians to have made it to the Time cover page.Reply

Some deletions edit

I removed fair use image Image:Perez_de_cuellar.gif, removed deleted Image:Pov.jpg. I also removed link to a wikibook Information_and_Communication_Technologies_for_Poverty_Alleviation as it is not authored by Swaminathan and may be considered as a publicity drive (though from a free source) here.--Victor D PARLE 02:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Frauds edit

The external link given by some is a propaganda site. There were several such sites which were banned by the govt fr spreading hatredness. ~rAGU

Neutrality tagging edit

This article needs some serious vetting for neutrality. It is getting close to advertisement. Swaminathan is certainly quite capable, but he doesn't walk on water. Michaelbusch (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think its more a problem of "Indian style" writing, with its flowery language and excessive use of superlative adjectives. I will try to clean some of it up. Sanyasi (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC) OK, I give up. Its pathological. Sanyasi (talk) 08:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Every prominent person has a few detractors. Swaminathan has survived controversies. His legacy will unlikely be subject to the contributions made by Wikipedia only. Like several other pieces where neutrality has been an issue, this one is most undesirable use of "lacks neutrality" tag. It should be removed from this article and Wikipedia should also consider creating a better governance structure for such anomalies rather than someone's whim put the "lacks neutrality" tag on it.

I agree with the above statement from anonymous, the neutrality tag can be removed. Just navigated to this page and it seems to read fine compared to several biographical pages I've just been reading. The tag is more distracting than helpful or instructive. Ebenheaven (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The scientific impact of Swaminathan can be deduced from his impact in the scientific literature. Science Citation Index lists a total of 1281 citations to a total of 204 listed publications and an h-index [measure of scientific impact] of 19 (retrieved Jan. 8th, 2011). While this does not call into questions his other contributions, notably against hunger, it does certainly not support the view that he had a great impact on science. ScienceCount (talk) 05:28, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality may be removed now. Sources have been confirmed. --Venkat.athma (talk) 06:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC) ₦ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.186.253.244 (talk) 07:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

May be removed edit

The list of publications and awards which are not of importance can be removed. δευ talk 16:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Magsaysay award medal.gif edit

The image Image:Magsaysay award medal.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Planting trees as a windshield post tsunami in coastal areas of Tamilnadu edit

The idea of planting trees as windshields in coastal areas post tsunami came from some foresters in the Tamil Nadu Forest Department (TNFD). This idea had been tried earlier, but failed due to violent opposition from the fishing community: who reside and dry their nets and catch in the coastal areas, which were marked for plantation. Post tsunami the idea was revived, through newspaper articles written by forest officers in English dailies.A project plan was drafted by a rural management professional and a forest officer, working through an TNFD supported NGOthe Society for Social Forestry Research and Development, Tamilnadu. This project went through the bureaucratic channels, was officially sanctioned - and funded by the World Bank,through an ongoing project around tsunami reconstruction in the year 2005. Due to the experiential realisation that mangrove plantations actually protected coastal villages,and good village extension work by the foresters working with the fishing community villages, this project was implemented successfully. All these documents would be available from the archives of SSFRDT, TNFD and the World Bank aided tsunami project. Dr.M.S.Swaminathan has had a lot of successful accomplishments: and deserves the greatest respect. But the idea of planting trees as a coastal windshield post tsunami cannot be credited to him. I hope there would be no objection if this particular statement is removed from the list of notable achievements. Anant (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:M. S. Swaminathan/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There's a lot of references, which is great. Problem is that it looks like little more than a bunch of lists. Convert this article to actual qriting and it could be a GA relatively easily. Had to rate it start thoguh.--Wizardman 15:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 22:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M. S. Swaminathan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M. S. Swaminathan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on M. S. Swaminathan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Changes to references edit

Chris Capoccia; Hi, please could you help me understand some changes you made to references under 'further reading':

  • Why did you remove the link to "M.S. Swaminathan: One Man's Quest for a Hunger-free World".?
  • Why were the links to Google Books removed?
  • Quinn, Kenneth M. - Why was this author link removed?
  • Why were the links to Quinns JSTOR hosted article as well as World Food Prize hosted article removed?
  • Language parameters for Tamil and Hungarian biographies?

Is this just making the references less text and link heavy, and removing links to urls with limited access and urls which do not adequately show that they have permission to host the content? However, some of the links you have added are not very helpful such as the new links for Quinns article in Current Science. DTM (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jstor is a parameter. we don't need both the URL and the parameter to the same place. Similar story for the google books link. Nothing in the general google books page is validating anything from the article as there is no preview. The ISBN link provides a much wider array of options to get to book content. Also some URLs were actually copyright issues as they were full copies not hosted by the publisher who was actually charging for copies.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lead infobox image edit

As of now, Commons has only 2-3 images which can be used as an infobox image.

  1. The current image— File:Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan - Kolkata 2013-01-07 2685.JPG
  2. A variation of the first image taken on the same day, but with glasses— File:Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan - Kolkata 2013-01-07 2671.JPG
  3. Another variation of the above— File:Monkombu Sambasivan Swaminathan - Kolkata 2013-01-07 2674.JPG

DTM (talk) 08:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

S.ST edit

Voice a concern 106.78.167.57 (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply