Talk:M-9 motorway (Pakistan)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Verbcatcher in topic Criticism of the motorway

M9 is NOT the Superhighway. NHA advertized tenders for construction of M9, which is going to be a 136 km long 6-Lane Access-Controlled Motorway, on 12 July 2009 in all the major newspapers of Pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.167.57.132 (talk) 08:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M9 motorway (Pakistan). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criticism of the motorway edit

There have been several reverted edits of text that lists issues with the road. These have been reverted by myself and by Yamaguchi先生, because no source has been cited. Information added to Wikipedia must cite a reliable source (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources). Sourcing is important to ensure that the content is accurate, and also to establish that it is important enough to include. The repeated addition of this unsourced information leads me to suspect that the contributor is campaigning for improvements to roads in Pakistan; Wikipedia is not the place for such campaigns. If there are well-known issues with this motorway then they would probably have been reported in Pakistani newspapers. I have just made a Google News search for this and found nothing to support this, although my search only gave English-language sources.

I will delete the content again, please do not restore it without adding a source. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply