Talk:M-17 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the lead, you say "The changes made to the highways in Washtenaw County even spawned BUS M-17, a business loop for 11 years." Why is it "even"? "Even" makes it sound like this was an unusual phenomenon... And maybe say a business loop between x year and y year, rather than for 11 years.
   • In the Route description section, you say "West of this cloverleaf interchange, Washtenaw Avenue west of this interchange is Business Loop Interstate 94" One of these "west"s needs to be removed, I think.
   • In the History section, you say "US and US 112" I think there might be a number missing here.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A couple of comments regarding prose, so I am putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyediting is done. Let me know if you have any other feedback. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response! Dana boomer (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)