Talk:M-13 Connector (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quality of article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Article complies with MoS.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   References included where necessary.

   C. No original research:

   No original research found.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   All major aspects about the topic have been covered.

   B. Focused:

   Article remains focused throughout.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Images used in the article are all tagged correctly.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments

I found a reference stating a 1961 opening which I have included in the article. Everything else is good.--Dom497 (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

There's a very specific reason I included that webpage only as an external link: it's a self-published source, and including it causes the article to fail the GA criteria. I have removed it. Imzadi 1979 → 01:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)