Talk:M-130 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by CycloneIsaac in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


Taking this article. Shouldn't take long to review it.--—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Couldn't find any mistakes in the article, so passing.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 19:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Maps are okay for GA
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    No images of the road though.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: