This article was nominated for deletion on January 19, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Britney Spears, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Britney Spears on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Britney SpearsWikipedia:WikiProject Britney SpearsTemplate:WikiProject Britney SpearsBritney Spears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
To the IP-hopper who is removing sourced content - please explain why you believe it should be removed here so that consensus can be reached prior to removal. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Although American sites reporting the incident are of varying degrees of reliability, foreign sources are covering the topic ([1] example from Die Welt). If it is restored it should only be a brief mention in order to avoid WP:UNDUE. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ponyo, that's not the way it works. Poorly sourced contentious information is removed under our WP:BLP policy, the onus is on anyone who wants the information in the article to reliably source it before it goes back in. Exxolon (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
What's "not the way thinks work" exactly? The sourced content was blanked once by an IP, with no explanation or edit summary, then it was blanked again by a different IP address, again without explanation or edit summary. I left left messages on both the user talk page and here asking for information as to what the problem was. That's it. I came back to see the article has been protected and was continuing discussion as to whether the information should be included, and to what extent. It seems I am the only person trying to create some sort of dialogue - I don't see how your message applies. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
The point is you don't need consensus to remove material in violation of BLP. The IP was perfectly correct to remove it, we seem to be objecting to the fact they didn't tell us why. Exxolon (talk) 00:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Exxolon, I really don't need a lecture on BLP policy. I've had this article watchlisted for a very long time and it's a common target for IP vandalism and blanking. If two IPs come in relatively quick succession and blank sourced content without any indication as to why, it appears as vandalism. I only reverted each IP on a single occasion and attempted to start a dialogue. I have continued to initiate dialogue here - but so far I seem to be the only person willing to do so. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am very sorry about this incident I have left a reply about this on my talk pageKyle1278 02:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am in the process of opening an AFD within a week or so. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.45.210 (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This child (apparently known as "Lexie" to the family) appears to exist, as this interview with Lynne Spears on YouTube (1:29–1:34) posted on May 18, 2012 attests. However, I know YouTube isn't a reliable source, and I can't find anything else to reliably cite her birth or even her full name—only the interview, postings on various Britney-related fan forums, and an alleged picture of the baby posted on a fan site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randee15 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that is believed to be Bryan's daughter. Notice in the dailymail article above that is says Bryan and JL walk "with their children," which means Sophia is apparently his. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:C002:D83A:2840:13A:18C0:265D (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
