This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Should political hit jobs be part of an article on a biography page?
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If this page contained all of Disanto's accomplishments and her controversies I could see including the content I removed. However to simply have a stub page where the majority of the content is meant to hurt the person politically seems to me to go against the spirit of wikipedia as a non-biased source for information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryno35 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The majority of this content is meant to hurt the subject of this article politically. It is not relevant to the biography of the subject. At least one editor User:Velella thinks the content is appropriate because "when a politician posts material herself that appears to show support for white supremacist views, then that is something very significant". However the social media post in question did not in any way "show support for white supremacist". This is the opinion of User:Velella and shows the political bias they bring to the editing of this article. As it stands now the content is inaccurate. The subject is no longer a member of the South Dakota House or Representatives. Ryno35 (talk) 23:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The content, that has been there since 2017, is supported by reliable sources including the Washington Post. A politician and a whip in the state legislature publishing the sort of content that she did is highly notable and has a bearing on her political views and possibly those of the party she represents. The post was withdrawn some time later and an apology was made but there was no denial of the facts. Removing such content amounts to white-washing a relevant history. For the record, I have no political opinions relevant to the United States, nor do I edit Wikipedia with any political agenda. To do so would be an anathema to the principles of Wikipedia. VelellaVelella Talk 19:16, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
