Talk:Lyndall Ryan

Latest comment: 3 years ago by WisDom-UK in topic Use of guardian newspaper as source

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lyndall Ryan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lyndall Ryan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Use of guardian newspaper as source edit

The Guardian states the massacres to be organised and state-sanctioned, therefore semi-genocidal in nature (not stated but heavily implied). The guardian is also a deeply biased source, ideologically far left and super woke. Why Wikipedia lets it be used as a source on controversial articles I don’t know. The right-wing daily mail is rightly banned. I don’t know enough about Australian history to judge this matter. How organised and centrally directed were the frontiers people? Did the government have any effective control over them? Did they explicitly command the killings or were they just turned a blind eye to? I don’t doubt for a minute that many were deeply racist, violent people with no respect for aboriginal life. But genocide is a serious allegation requiring solid sourcing, not a left wing English newspaper no one in Britain would take seriously as a unbiased source.WisDom-UK (talk) 18:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply