Talk:Lydia Hart

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Raintheone in topic Sources
Good articleLydia Hart has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Lydia leaving edit

Iv just found out that Lydia is leaveing in January 2010 dose this mean that she will be found out?--Sheep 2009 (talk) 20:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know, this is not a forum. Plus, unless you have a source for that, make sure you don't add it. W93 (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Lydia is leaving read this. http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s13/hollyoaks/spoilers/a190264/2724-lydia-stabs-zoe-at-sarahs-grave.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheep 2009 (talkcontribs) 18:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Does not state she is leaving. Please only make edits like you did with actual references.W93 (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
its proves a lot i don't think the police will let her go after she killed someone.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
You are completely speculating, yes it says she is arrested. However, she might not actually go to jail. Until you find a source that says otherwise, this can not be considered reliable.W93 (talk) 22:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
as Lydia left hollyoaks now or is she returning.--92.4.50.27 (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
She's left, the character was given a life sentence and no trial as she pled guilty.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 23:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lydia Hart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HorrorFan121 (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this article. ;) I have found a few minor problems with the article.

  • Channel 5 links to a disambiguation page. [1] This needs to be corrected.  Y
  • The article has two rotted links. These [2] (#4) [3] (#24) need to be fixed.  Y

Lead

  • The lead should summarize the article as a whole. The reception of the character should be mentioned somewhere in there.  Y

Prose

  • I found no problems with the prose after reading the article. No grammar/spelling mistakes.  Y

Citations

  • The last sentence of the reception section should have a citation.  Y
  • No problem with reliability on the sources.  Y


Overall, a very interesting article. Once you fixed these issues I brought up it should be good. HorrorFan121 (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed all the points mentioned. I expanded the lead to reflect the reception, there are now no disambiguation or dead links.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 18:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Great! The article can be listed now. Congrats on the hard work. ;) HorrorFan121 (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit