Talk:Lurita Doan

Who Was Her Mother?

The article does not say. John Paul Parks (talk) 16:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Citation needed

The lead has the statement "She was the first woman, and second African American, to hold the position.", but this doesn't seem to be backed up by any cited text in the body of the article or by an inline citation. Something to be clarified: please resolve. Thanks, dave souza, talk 18:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Done, though the "second Af-Am" appears to be WP:OR so I removed it. Since she resigned the Web page changed at that address changed. No worries, though, thanks to Google Cache.--Happysomeone (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, that seems supported and there is also confirmation that she's African American, though nothing I've seen about second. Could you put an inline cite to that source for the statement, or mention the issue in the text along with an inline cite? Or have I missed something? . . dave souza, talk 20:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Placing too much information in the lede

While the addition of career information by Luritadoan is helpful, it doesn't belong in the lede paragraph of the article. See WP:LEDE. Are you really Lurita Doan? If so, that also might present a problem.--Happysomeone (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Original Research/Synthesis in resignation

For everyone's benefit, I'm excising the relevant part of my old discussion and pasting it here with regards to the claim that "no action was taken" against Doan. It doesn't say that anywhere in the cite. It also doesn't mention an important finding from the US Office of Special Counsel. This quote is 1) In violation of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and 2) Is factually incorrect. Here's the old discussion:

"It is true that she was never found in a court to have violated any law (2). This is, however, due solely to the fact that the agency responsible for prosecution is the Office of the President (as she is a Presidential appointee, and not under the Merit Systems Protection Board's purview). It is therefore disingenuous to suggest in this way that this is nothing more than "interagency personality conflict." This conflict reaches into the top tier of our government. The article, as it now stands and properly cited, demonstrates Doan [7] was found in violation of Federal law by an investigative body and should be left unedited."

--Happysomeone (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060708184104/http://www.gsa.gov:80/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?pageTypeId=8199&channelId=-13260&P=XAP&contentId=21099&contentType=GSA_BASIC to http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?pageTypeId=8199&channelId=-13260&P=XAP&contentId=21099&contentType=GSA_BASIC
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070328193121/http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1200 to http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1200
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060928184540/http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?programId=9620&channelId=-13331&ooid=11143&contentId=13969&pageTypeId=8199&contentType=GSA_BASIC&programPage=/ep/program/gsaBasic.jsp&P=JPM to http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?programId=9620&channelId=-13331&ooid=11143&contentId=13969&pageTypeId=8199&contentType=GSA_BASIC&programPage=%2Fep%2Fprogram%2FgsaBasic.jsp&P=JPM
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110604072611/http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?last=DOAN&first=LURITA to http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?last=DOAN&first=LURITA

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lurita Doan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060708184104/http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?pageTypeId=8199&channelId=-13260&P=XAP&contentId=21099&contentType=GSA_BASIC to http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?pageTypeId=8199&channelId=-13260&P=XAP&contentId=21099&contentType=GSA_BASIC
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?programId=9620&channelId=-13331&ooid=11143&contentId=13969&pageTypeId=8199&contentType=GSA_BASIC&programPage=%2Fep%2Fprogram%2FgsaBasic.jsp&P=JPM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)