Talk:Luo Zilin

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

File:Luo Zilin Crowned 2011 Miss Universe China.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:Luo Zilin Crowned 2011 Miss Universe China.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Help request edit

{{adminhelp}} How can I remove the following words on this article "This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (December 2011)" There are 8 references, two external links, and more than 30 internal links. --Mjrshanghai (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

First of all, there is nothing in your request which needs an administrator: any experienced user could have answered.
The message you refer to was placed by Visik on 5 December 2011. There are certain sections of the article which have no footnotes, and presumably that was what Visik was referring to. However, if that was what was meant, then {{Unreferenced section}} would have been a more appropriate template to use.The answer to your question about how to remove it is to edit the page and remove {{more footnotes|date=December 2011}}. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Roseline luo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Roseline luo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Roseline luo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Luo Zilin "Roseline".jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Luo Zilin "Roseline".jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Luo Zilin "Roseline".jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Crowning Moment 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Crowning Moment 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Crowning Moment 1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luo Zilin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply