Talk:Luminara Unduli

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Luminara unduli.jpg

Untitled edit

  • Things are broken. Anyone know how to fix the template?--Shinyplasticbag 04:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Easily match Count Dooku? edit

"She had power that very few Jedi would be able to parallel; it was said that she could easily match the skills of fallen Jedi Master Count Dooku, one of the Order's most powerful members"

Is there a source for this? Or is this rhetorical exaggeration?--Seti 17:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Windu considered her? edit

"Also, Mace Windu considered Luminara and Barris Offee to fight along with him against Palpatine, although he didn't call them because he thought it would late to save the Jedi order because the two of them were in the Outer Rim."

What's the source for this piece of information? I am dubious of this statement, and just interested if this is actual fact or not. Navex 03:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)NavexReply

Fair use rationale for Image:Luminara unduli.jpg edit

 

Image:Luminara unduli.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply