 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Prod edit
Although this was deprodded and reprodded, I don't think it needs sent to AfD. If you check out the talk page of the editor who deprodded it, the removal was not related to the article, but part of a personal dispute. But if someone thinks it ought to be sent to AfD instead, I can see that position as well. NickelShoe 20:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Do Not Remove edit
I don't see why this article needs to be removed. It has ligitimate information and poses no harm.
- Discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Lemon. But you ought to read the guidelines at WP:CORP first, to understand a little more where others are coming from. NickelShoe 04:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
No reason to delete edit
Lululemon is a valid "thing", a very successful company that is in the midst of expansion. Why does it need to be deleted? I would associate it with pop culture (it combines both yoga/spirituality with the trends of the moment) and there are many, many other pop culture references on the wiki!
Merge edit
I believe the correct name for this successful and growing company is lululemon athletica, however people tend to refer to the company - as well as their product - as lululemon. I think the articles should be merged under the full name.
Merge edit
The two names both lululemon and "lululemon athletica" are synonymous, both refer to the same company and brand of clothing. Thus they should be merged under the correct name for the company "lululemon athletica".