Talk:Luke Johnson Phone Experiment

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

this meets notability, under web content.

There needs to be some backing to such a claim. The question of the article's existence really doesn't depend on what the subject matter is, but how well known it is. Personally, I would vote for deletion, I believe there is too much forming of new pages to cover events that don't really warrent it, too much over-blowing of minor trends or fads that pass largely unnoticed, forgotten soon enough. That's merely my view on it though. Prophaniti 05:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

For my part, I've removed the tags (I placed them initially)-secondary sources are cited, and this thing does look to have received a great deal of coverage. Dumb or not, it looks to be notable. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 05:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The thing is it's not only how big or important it is, an encyclopedia is supposed to contain information about things and events. If ever someone asks himself "What IS the Luke Johnson Phone Experiement I read about on some forum" he can look it up here and find it.

Fair use rationale for Image:Luke johnson.png edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Luke johnson.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Luke Johnson Phone Experiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic