Talk:Lucius Caesar

Lucius Caesar has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 6, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Lucius Caesar received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Lucius Caesar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Rome's first emperor, Augustus, adopted his grandsons Lucius and Gaius?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lucius Caesar.

Wikipedia

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucius Caesar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 06:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Came in to work on the peer review, saw it was at GAN. Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a Y

2.b Y

2.c Y

2.d Y
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No Dead links Y
Images appropriately licensed Y, both images are licensed appropriately.

Prose Suggestions

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

on 20 August AD 2, in Massilia, Gaul add a comma after Gaul.
His father was an early supporter of Augustus (then "Octavius") during the Final War of the Roman Republic that ensued as a result of the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BC. Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa Suggest you switch the usage of "his father" in first sentence and full name in second sentence.
Augustus' armies, having seen command in pivotal battles suggest change to Augustus' armies, commanding troops in pivotal battles
Augustus who was seemingly on his deathbed in 23 BC, Add a comma after Augustus.
only the emperor and his immediate heir could hope to attain. The tribunician power allowed him to control the Senate, and it was first given to Julius Caesar and could only be held by the emperor. seems to be redundant and contradictive; could only the emperor hold it, or could him and his immediate heir hold it? If both could, remove the and could only be held by the emperor., if only emperor, revise first sentence and then remove the piece in second sentence.
Having no heir since the death of Marcellus, Augustus immediately adopted Lucius and his brother from their father by a symbolic sale following Lucius' birth, and named the two boys his heirs. Is there any given reason why Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa was not himself made heir? And any indication as to his response to his sons being made heir instead of him?
In the span of 18 months, the planned future of Rome was shaken. suggest removing planned, might wish to switch to "the succession of Rome" instead.
@SpartaN: That is all my comments, will pass the article now. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Made all changes, and will look for Agrippa's thoughts on the adoption of Gaius and Lucius. It is just as likely that we have no idea what Agrippa thought about it. I appreciate the review. SpartaN (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic