Talk:Lucia, California

More details forthcoming

It is true that there is only a single business at the location today, operated by the family who first obtained a land patent for the land. If the Deletion Review is successful, I intend to add more content documenting the historical notability of the location and the families who lived in the area. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 06:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Official site

Graywalls, you removed the link to the Lucia Lodge website, stating that it was not an official link to the "city". Perhaps you didn't notice, but this is not a city. It's not a town. It's not even a village. It is an historic settlement, and the only commercial building remaining is the Lodge, which comprises the current settlement along with various residents in the area. There's no official link to the settlement because the settlement is unincorporated and has no official government outside of the county. That's the only link to the settlement that is possible is the link to the lodge. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 00:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

This might also be a candidate for a re-direct. Either to Big Sur or Monterey County, California ~~ Graywalls (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)