 | Lucas Bros. Moving Co. has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Lucas Bros. Moving Co. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Proposed merge with List of Lucas Bros. Moving Co. episodes edit
I propose a merge with the main series article. With only six episodes, this is not the time to spin-out into a main article - which is also very short and hardly cramped for space. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 23:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support merge as creator of the list. 23W 00:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucas Bros. Moving Co./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bentvfan54321 (talk · contribs) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm tired of focusing on Deflategate, "Y'all know why I'm here", the best corner in the game, and lame commercials. I'll review this to kill some time. Thanks again for taking on Beat the Chefs. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The Original Channel parameter says "Fox (2013–2014)". I believe MoS says this should be (2013–14).
- The second episodes summary states, "Upon raising $150.00..." I don't think the ".00" is necessary.
- Can the third episode summary be expanded beyond just one sentence?
- The Rotten Tomatoes link is dead. Can that be replaced?
- My main concern is the lack of information in the second season's episode list. It appears the list is not fully up to date. A summary of those episodes as well is probably necessary before this becomes a GA.
With these concerns, I'll put this on hold for now. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this, Bentvfan54321. With the episode summaries for season one, I ended up copy editing the entirety of them as they contained a lot of errors. With regards to the second season, I'm not sure I'd consider it a "main aspect" of the article; even without the summaries we still have the premise of the show in the first section. It might take me a while to watch the episodes and write the summaries out, but if it's absolutely necessary I suppose I can. Everything else I think I've corrected. 23W 04:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Knowing that you are a capable editor, I'll give it a pass assuming you will come back eventually to finish this up. Also, no sweat if you are busy, but I currently have an article, 2006 UAW-Ford 500, that desperately needs a through review. If you can look at that for me, I'll go ahead and review Dan Deacon: U.S.A. or another one of your nominations as well. Thanks for the quick response! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Bentvfan54321: No problem. Thanks for reviewing! I'll see if I can look the article next week, maybe. 23W 04:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Knowing that you are a capable editor, I'll give it a pass assuming you will come back eventually to finish this up. Also, no sweat if you are busy, but I currently have an article, 2006 UAW-Ford 500, that desperately needs a through review. If you can look at that for me, I'll go ahead and review Dan Deacon: U.S.A. or another one of your nominations as well. Thanks for the quick response! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Cast list edit
@Rtkat3: Not entirely sure the following cast information is discriminate. How many are actually notable (i.e., picked up in entertainment news sites), and if so, is a list really the best way to present it?:
Extended content
|
|---|
Cast
Additional voices
|
23W 01:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)