Talk:Loyens & Loeff

Requested edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, my name is Katja Pauwels. I'm a communications adviser at Loyens & Loeff. I would like to contribute objective information to keep the Loyens & Loeff page up-to-date. Unfortunately, at the moment the page contains outdated information:

- Loyens & Loeff was founded and is headquarterd in Rotterdam [1].

- We have 17 offices: Amsterdam, Arnhem, Aruba, Brussels, Curacao, Dubai, Eindhoven, Frankfurt, Geneva, London, Luxembourg, New York, Paris, Rotterdam, Singapore, Tokyo and Zurich [2].

- The firm was formed in 2000 through a merger between Loyens & Volkmaars and a part of Loeff Claeys Verbeke [3].

- For a current overview of our awards, please see http://www.loyensloeff.com/en-US/News/WhatOthersSay/Pages/Default.aspx. In the next couple of days I will produce a more detailed list with hyperlinks to the guides and organisations that awarded us with these prizes, but this way you can already have a look at a broad overview.

- I will also soon give you a list of external links with objective up-to-date information about the firm.

I hope you will check this out and edit the page so that it contains accurate information again.

If you have any question or comments, please leave a message on User_talk:CMEPforLL or drop me a line at katja.pauwels@loyensloeff.com!

CMEPforLL (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you're welcome to edit this article with the information you provided. The main concerns with addressing editors with a potential conflict of interest is that they follow our neutral point of view, and verifiability policies, and that they don't insert material that is more promotional than encyclopedic. You appear to have a grasp of the type of information we want, so I'm giving you the go-ahead to edit this. The information you add should be cited if it can be contested; look over this page to see how to cite sources. Also look over our external links guidelines for what type of links you should add. Generally you shouldn't add links that contain information that you can add to the article yourself and cite as a reliable source. If you have any questions about any of this, feel free to contact me at my talk page. Them From Space 09:27, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you for your warm welcome! I am now in the process of editing the L&L page bit by bit. If you have any questions or comments about my editing please let me know :) CMEPforLL (talk) 09:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's been a while, but here I am again... The Loyens & Loeff Wikipedia page can certainly use an update again. So I'll be updating it soon, based on objective and up-to-date information about the firm. Any questions or comments? Please let me know! CMEPforLL (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loyens & Loeff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic